Suashish Diamonds – Delisting case – Another case of collusion?

Suashish Diamonds [BSE code: BSE: 526733] is engaged in import of rough diamonds, cutting and polishing the same and export of cut and polished diamonds. Yesterday company announced its intention to delist. See the announcement here   Yesterday closing price was INR 200 and company  announced indicated floor price of INR 230. Company shares trades under illiquid category so as per SEBI rules delisting price is based on “Other parameters including return on net worth, book value of the shares of the company, earning per share, price earning multiple vis-à-vis the industry average.” In simple words delisting price will be based on promoter’s honesty and willingness to pay fair value to minority shareholders.

Financials [all numbers from 31st March 2012 annual report, as company does not report consolidated numbers for its quarterly results]

It has a short term loan of 450crs, but also has investments [shares & debentures] of 330cr and cash of around 300crs. So effectively it’s a debt free company. FA turnover is above 14x which shows business is quite asset light. Over the last six years it has generated free cash flow [after tax, WC and FA] of more than 400 crs [This is after sudden spike in receivables & inventory in 2012 which resulted in negative OCF of around 150crs for 2012]. Current market cap of company is around 420crs and even at proposed delisting price of 230, implied market cap will be only 480crs, which appears to be quite less when compared to the FCF generated of more than 400crs in last six years. So on average FCF multiple is around 7x. Networth is around 730crs out of which fixed assets are less than 70crs and balance are reflected by liquid assets like cash, shares and working capital. So company is proposing to delist at less than 0.7x book value.

So is there a possibility of higher delisting price?

Don’t jump looking at above valuation. I do not think there is ANY POSSIBILITY of fair price getting discovered in this delisting. To me, it appears to be another case of ‘Mutually agreed’ delisting case like Fresenius Kabi Oncology [read here more on this], though I must admire Suashish Diamonds to be more sophisticated when compared to Fresenius Kabi Oncology.

Suspected Scheme [ or just my ILLUSION….]:  Mere presence of Religare [ex-promoters of Ranbaxy] makes me jittery and may be enough reason to do EXTRA due diligence. Religare Fininvest holds 3.3% stake in the company and another 14 individual shareholders holds another 2% stake. For delisting, company needs to acquire minimum of 5.3% stake. Thus just 15 entities consent is enough to get the company delisted. As per my rough calculations Religare acquired its stake at around 130-140 per share. So even if they tender its shares at 230 per share, it will earn CAGR of more than 30% in less than 2 years or a flat return of more than 60%. On face of it, it may appear to be a genuine case and possibly there may not be any collusion between promoters and other entities. But there is a VERY HIGH PROBABILITY that with the help of these 15 entities company can easily delist at less than 0.7x its book value. Though, this valuation is not justified looking at huge FCF generated in the recent 5-6 years.

Failed delisting attempt of 2010:  In 2010 promoters tried to delist at INR 220 [Effectively they agreed to raise price merely by 5% after two years though networth has increased by more than 18%] In 2010 when the company attempted delisting, MF together held 7.5% stake and the discovered price of INR 320 was merely 1.1x BV and 8x TTM PE, which was quite reasonable, but promoters refused to accept the discovered price. So this time when the INDEPENDENCE of these 15 entities is SUSPICIOUS, I do not think there is very high PROBABILITY of discovery of true value in delisting. It is possible that its just my ILLUSION and too much PESSIMISM. I think investment is a game of probabilities and in my view probability of higher price is very less , So better to STAY AWAY…..

Other points:

1)      Religare Fininvest acquired majority of its stake during Sept-11, when MFs which were stuck after its earlier failed delisting attempt, were eager to exit.

2)      Despite huge free cash flow, company has not paid any dividend in the last four years. Company which has generated FCF of more than 400 crs in last 6 years, paid less than 40crs as dividend in the past   15 years.

3)      Entire FCF over the years was invested [?] in NCD of real estate companies, partnership firms [on an investment of 270 crs, it earned profit of less than 4 crs. Merely 2% return] and other listed companies.


  1. All the posts on this blog, including this one, are for educational and discussion purposes only.
  2. None of the material posted should be regarded as advice to buy/sell any stock. I do not have any proven stock performance record to talk about.
  3. As a professional investor, I may have positions in stocks discussed.
  4. Main objective is to seek contra views and not to recommend any particular stock as buy or sell.
This entry was posted in Special Situations and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Suashish Diamonds – Delisting case – Another case of collusion?

  1. Sunil Pitre says:

    According to the company’s preveious years annual reports ,company have following assets.
    A. Two floors / about 8,000 sq ft area Regd. office at Mehta Mahal, Mumbai.
    B. 1, 00,000 sq. ft. area factory at Borivali, Mumbai.
    C.130 Ishi’s outlet in India and Middle East. ( Company refuse this assets )
    D.16000 sq ft area space in SEZ at seepze, Andheri, Mumbai.
    E. 9000 sq ft area premises at diamond bourse at BKC, Mumbai.
    F. Global office at Dallas (USA) and Honking.
    G. Factory at Botswana.
    H. 29 factories across western parts of India

    What about the value of these assets ? Is this consider at the tiime of dilisting ?


    • anil1820 says:

      Hi Sunil

      Ideally it should be considered. But as I have mentioned in my post, promoters have indicated the floor price of INR 230 and just 15 shareholders need to come together to enable promoter to accumulate 5.3% stake [which is required to make delisting successful]. So there is very LOW probability that floor price will be revised upwards.



  2. Very informative . We enjoyed reading your analysis.

    If , we the minority Non Promoter share holders feel that the Exit Price is not fair, then is not tendering the shares in the Exit offer , also an option .

    please consider the following :-

    1 ) As it is , shares of Suashish Diamonds are very rarely traded . So , it is a good or bad as being Delisted.

    2 ) Secondly , there are Sites like our , where there is a good platform for deals in delisted shares.


    • anil1820 says:

      Thanks Ashwani Kumar

      I agree with your point that as Suashish Diamonds is traded very rarely delisting is good. In theory minority share holder do have an option of not tendering shares even after delisting is successful. But what one will do if one cannot trust management. One will be sitting on an illiquid asset. This topic is covered in detail on this blog too Thanks for sharing link to your blog.



      • Theoretically , vis-a-vis Non Promoter Share Holders,a certain Management can be ” untrustworthy ‘ in the scenario if the percentage of Non Promoters shares in the Share Holding pattern is very large.

        But , after Delisting if the the percentage of Non Promoter Share Holding falls to , let us say , 2 % then there would be a negative incentive for the Managements to be dishonest.


        • anil1820 says:

          Quite possible

          It all depends on one estimate of risk-reward ratio. I find it very difficult to estimate risk-reward ratio where I cannot trust management AT ALL. I can still bet for short term of say 3-6 months in case of special situations, but not comfortable investing for long term.


  3. Pingback: Delisting of Suashish/Fresenius – Same Same but Different | Contrarian Edge

  4. .
    Suashish Diamonds is holding an EGM on 05/01/2016 at Mumbai

    Now , Suashish Diamonds intends to compulsorily eject the remainder 1204 loyal small shareholders ( Total shareholders 1217 ) by following the cheap trick of increasing the face value of one share from Rs. 10 paid up to Rs. One Lakh paid up.

    Promoter Ashish R. Goenka holds 99: 06 % of shares.

    As Suashish Diamonds , now, unlisted , the resultant fractions have been arbitrarily valued at Rs. 242 ( for Rs.10 paid up shares ) ( same at the Exit price determined 2 years back.

    This is totally unacceptable and is sheer loot.


    The Valuers etc are all engaged by the Managements and cannot be considered as Unbiased or totally Fair. Affected shareholders should e allowed to have their own valuers / Valuation Reports.


    SEBI must intervene. Laws must be changed to protect the small share holders of Unlisted Companies.


    Same anti small shareholder trick by Promoters of MNC Bosch Chassis ( Kalyani Brakes ) and real estate laden Jolly Boards.


  5. Suashish Diamonds intends to compulsorily eject the remainder 1204 loyal small shareholders ( Total shareholders 1217 ) by following the cheap trick of increasing the face value of one share from Rs. 10 paid up to Rs. One Lakh paid up.

    Promoter Ashish R. Goenka holds 99: 06 % of shares.

    As Suashish Diamonds , now, unlisted , the resultant fractions have been arbitrarily valued at Rs. 242 ( for Rs.10 paid up shares ) ( same at the Exit price determined 2 years back.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s